Maturity Level of Your Management Accounting

Maturity Level of Your Management Accounting

Gary Cokins from North Carolina, USA, developed the “Costing Levels Continuum Maturity Framework 2.0”. Its version 2.0 was reviewed by the International Federation of Accountants IFAC in 2013 and published as a guide to good practice in cost accounting (IFAC-Evaluating-the-Costing-Journey_0.pdf).

This framework is designed to help management accounting professionals assess the maturity of their own system. How well does the system work in providing managers with data that is relevant to their decisions and their responsibilities?

It also helps organizations align the maturity level of their management accounting system with the decision-making needs of their managers.

12 maturity levels of your own management accounting

Cokins structures the Costing Levels Continuum Maturity Model into 12 maturity levels, ranging from simple accounting analysis to a comprehensive simulation model:

    • Levels 1-8 cover the systematics from financial accounting to internal accounting, activity-based full-cost accounting (also known as standard full-cost accounting), cost allocation using activity-based costing (ABC), the comparison of revenues and costs per customer, and the quantification of unused capacities.
    • Levels 9 and 10 compare plan to actual comparisons and attempt to allocate fixed costs to products and customers based on activities.
    • Level 11 requires the implementation of Resource Consumption Accounting (RCA). RCA corresponds almost completely to Grenzplankostenrechnung according to H. G. Plaut, Flexible Budgeting according to W. Kilger and the multi-level and multi-dimensional  Contribution Accounting as described in this blog.
    • Level 12 is reached when simulations from the product and customer level to the entire company are possible on the basis of level 11 data.
Maturity Level of Your management Accounting
Maturity Level of Your management Accounting
Description of the 12 levels
    • Level 1 is pure financial accounting (general ledger, payroll accounting, purchasing)
    • Level 2 also assigns the expenses to cost centers and cost types
    • Level 3 posts the direct material and labor costs per product group (also fixed labor costs)
    • Level 4 allocates the indirect costs of the service areas to the cost centers that work directly on the products with the help of a single allocation factor.
    • Level 5 looks at individual manufactured units for the first time. This requires links to bills of materials and the work schedules (ERP). The manufactured quantities are generated from historical data. In expanded versions, the costs are also recorded per production order or per project.
    • Level 6 attempts to allocate fixed costs to individual products on the basis of estimated or measured consumption using Activity Based Costing (ABC) (this still corresponds to an unfair allocation of fixed costs).
    • Level 7 includes sales and net revenues for the first time. It attempts to allocate the costs of marketing, sales and promotion, as well as the entire administration and management, to customers and products using allocation keys. These allocations are shown in the period statement for each customer or product but are not included in the inventory values.
    • Level 8 calculates the costs of unused capacities (personnel, machinery, IT, other equipment) of the cost centers and attempts to allocate these to the customers and sales channels.
    • From level 9 onwards, planned and actual values for revenues and costs are used to support decision-making and thus planning. This brings the splitting of costs into their proportional and fixed portions to the fore. In addition, planning is based on the needs of existing and potential customers, rather than just on the people and equipment available.
    • Level 10 only uses planned quantities and times derived from target-oriented planning to calculate products. These form the standards. However, fixed costs continue to be allocated to products and customers via the cost rates of the cost centers.
    • Level 11 brings the comprehensive application of the causation principle as described in this blog and being used since many years in Grenzplankostenrechnung (GPK) and Flexible Budgeting in German-speaking countries. These two systems are largely consistent in terms of methodology. In the US this method is known as Resource Consumption Accounting (RCA). RCA also wants to answer the question: How much should the produced or sold products and services have cost, if they had been provided exactly according to plan?
    • Level 12 is reached when simulations can be run based on level 11 (GPK or RCA) and on the ERP and CRM data. The aim of simulations is to determine and implement programs that optimize results on the basis of current order backlogs and management accounting data.

Background and purpose of the continuum

The Costing Continuum Model was developed based on knowledge of the application of different cost accounting systems in the English-speaking world, particularly in the United States. The model is indirectly a consequence of the famous book by Robert Kaplan and Thomas Johnson entitled “Relevance lost. The rise and fall of management accounting” (Harvard Business School Press, 1987). This book also criticized the fact that most cost accounting departments focus on meeting reporting standards (US GAAP / IFRS) but that hardly any suitable systems are used to support managers’ decision-making. From 2004, it was recognized that Marginal Cost Accounting (Grenzplankostenrechnung GPK) and Flexible Budgeting can largely cover these needs. In the USA, this led to Resource Consumption Accounting (RCA, level 11).

In German-speaking countries the software developments by the Plaut group and SAP, as well as many other software providers, led to many companies that reached level 11 in their management accounting. However, in our practical experience, compliance with accounting standards and statutory accounting and transfer pricing regulations still takes precedence over decision support for managers at all levels and in all functions.

The Continuum is designed to help controllers and finance professionals assess the extent to which the systems and processes they have installed provide relevant information for management decision-making. This applies to both operational and strategic management.

Application of the Maturity Model

Organizations using Flexible Budgeting or GPK are at level 11. For this they need to have access to ERP-data as well as sales and revenue planning and to link those to Management Accounting. This is a prerequisite to reach levels 11 and 12. For running simulations quantities and services must be available as planned and actual figures for each item number and customer and for each cost center. Flexible Budgeting is to be set up in the cost centers so that the actual costs can be compared with the planned costs of the services provided.

Even if artificial intelligence is used to plan and control success, it derives its suggestions from the available plans and the actual data. It cannot develop new plans.

In the simulation model of our book “Management Control System”, it is possible to change prices, sales deductions, quantities, services and proportional cost rates. The Excel-model immediately calculates the consequences of changes in the basic input variables through to the internal profit and loss statement and the internal balance sheet.

This is not artificial intelligence, but it allows decision-makers to follow the consequences of each change step by step.

Management Accounting or Bookkeeping?

Management Accounting or Bookkeeping?

A chief financial officer (CFO) has the task to maintain the company’s solvency at all times and to value and publish the items in the income statement and in the balance sheet in accordance with the applicable legal and tax reporting rules. To this end CFOs and their accountants use the double-entry bookkeeping method (first documented by Luca Pacioli 530 years ago (see Luca Pacioli, “Abhandlung über die Buchhaltung 1494”, C.E. Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart 1933)).

Most countries and international accounting standards (IFRS and US GAAP) require inventories to be valued at full production cost in reporting. Full costing also applies to the calculation of transfer prices between companies in different countries. Due to this CFOs want to set up their cost accounting system to value inventories at full cost and to show the cost price per unit.

If managers responsible for strategic and operational management leave the design of the management accounting system largely to the CFO, he will place the emphasis on fulfilling his information requirements and thus on inventory valuation at full cost of sales.

The CEO and his managers, on the other hand, plan and control capacities (personnel and equipment), order-related consumption of materials, external services and work performed by the cost centers. Thus, they expect the management accounting system to show the net revenue, the proportional product costs and the contribution margin for each product or service unit. Net profits are only generated if the contribution margin volume is greater than the fixed cost total in a period.

To fulfill this purpose the planned costs must be split into their proportional and fixed components in the cost centers performing the work. Fixed costs are incurred for the cost centers’ readiness to perform. They are incurred for periods of time (month, year) and are determined by management decisions. Proportional production costs are incurred when products or services are manufactured:

    • Bills of materials record the planned consumption per unit and result in the direct material costs,
    • Work plans show the processing time for each item per production cost center. Multiplied by the proportional planned cost rate of the cost center, the proportional manufacturing costs are calculated.

Thus, any decision-oriented management accounting system must be able to split the planned costs into their proportional and fixed parts. Calculations must show for each product or service unit which material and

third-party service costs are directly caused by the units produced (proportional) and which are the (fixed) costs of the readiness to perform in the cost centers. This is because the contribution margins are used to cover the fixed, mainly period-dependent costs, and the profit.

When designing the decision-relevant management accounting system, it is important to keep in mind:

    • Fixed costs are incurred for the creation and maintenance of the company’s readiness to perform. Managers usually plan personnel and machine capacities on an annual basis and control them monthly.
    • Production of products and/or services causes proportional costs. They are incurred with each unit produced. To calculate them, bills of materials and routings are required, which cannot be found in the accounting system, but only in the ERP system.
    • Management accounting must be able to calculate the flexible budget per cost center. It shows the planned proportional and fixed costs based on the actual performance of the cost center. This step is necessary because customers rarely order exactly what the company planned.
    • The difference between the flexible budget and the actual costs is the spending variance. It is calculated and presented in every cost center per cost type. The cost center manager has the task to keep spending variances low.
    • As there is no direct causal link between the units produced and the flexible budget costs of a cost center, spending variances are transferred from there to the operating result (EBIT).
    • According to the causation principle costs for excess plant capacity cannot be allocated to the units produced and sold. This is because depreciation is the result of investment decisions made earlier by top management. Depreciation costs for assets can only be clearly allocated to the cost center or to the whole company.
Management Accounting or bookkeeping
Management Accounting or bookkeeping

In summary even well-developed financial accounting systems are neither suitable for costing nor for corporate management. They cannot map direct cause-and-effect relationships, as the data link to the specified quantities and times in the parts lists and work plans is missing. Information on the products sold and the net revenue generated with a given customer can only be found in sales order processing and invoicing, not in financial accounting.

Decision-relevant management accounting requires the use of flexible budgeting in the cost centers and of contribution margin accounting.  In English-speaking countries, this method is known as Resource Consumption Accounting RCA.

An analysis with ChatGPT (10/14/2024) revealed that the following companies offer RCA-enabled  software:

    • SAP (SAP Profitability and Performance Management)
    • Microsoft AX
    • Infor (Infor CloudSuite Industrial or Infor ERP LN)
    • Prophix

This list does not claim to be exhaustive. Our practical experience is based on our customers’ implementations with SAP, Infor and Microsoft AX.

Management Accounting in Public Administration

Management accounting in public administration

The costs of public institutions and administrations are constantly rising, whether due to inflation, higher staffing levels, more services, new legal requirements or political decisions. These tasks are usually financed by tax contributions, user fees of all kinds or financial contributions from other sources.
As a result, the administrative and management areas of municipalities, cities, districts or countries are increasingly occupied with the cost-effective management of their own operations and facilities. With financial accounting, only rudimentary evaluations per cost center can be delivered. To individual products and services there is no reference if there is no decision relevant management accounting.

Some examples of affected organizational units:

    • Kindergardens, elementary school, secondary schools through to universities, vocational training and further education and training for professionals
    • Leisure facilities and public swimming pools
    • Water supply and wastewater
    • Energy supply
    • Waste disposal
    • Local police and fire departments, local public transport organizations
    • Maintenance of roads, squares, parks, cemeteries
    • Retirement and nursing homes, medical services
    • Tax offices
    • Information and advisory organizations for citizens.

Managers, politicians and citizens want to know how much the products and services cost per unit, what costs are to be borne by each administrative area and how the costs per service unit change over time.
This presupposes that the products and services of public administration units are defined and that work plans and – where applicable – bilss of material are drawn up for each product. Similar to industrial companies, management accounting systems must therefore be set up which can calculate planned, target and actual costs per cost center and product or service.
The book “Kosten-Leistungsrechnung für die Verwaltung” (Management accounting for public administration) shows with various examples how management accounting can be realized in public administrations in plan and actual. Together with the Office for Municipalities of the Canton of Zurich (Switzerland), the product catalog of a smaller city was developed. This catalogue is included in the aforementioned book and serves as a template for structuring and calculating cost centers, products and services (incl. CD with integrated numerical model).

Management Accounting for Hospitals

Hospitals, nursing facilities and retirement homes

Management accounting is important for hospitals, nursing facilities and retirement homes because patients and insurance organizations require proof of the costs of treatment. The main object of analysis is the individual case of a particular patient. Invoicing is usually based on (legally) regulated tariffs.

External case-related services (e.g. X-rays) can be assigned to the “case” (person treated). Many purchases from the hospital pharmacy and aids from the hospital warehouse can also be assigned to the case. In a production company, one would speak of external service and direct material costs, which are charged directly to the product, i.e. the case, using warehouse withdrawal slips or vendor invoices.

Services from the kitchen, especially special catering or drinks, can also be recorded on a case-by-case basis.

In cost accounting, purchases of medicines or auxiliary materials for cost centers, e.g. a nursing or bed ward, which cannot be allocated directly to the individual case, are referred to as material overheads. These items are included in the proportional planned cost rate of the respective cost center, e.g. an inpatient ward.

Personnel costs are usually the most important cost type in a hospital. They are planned and reported by cost center. By recording services, it is possible to determine how many working hours are used directly for the care of individual patients (case-related proportional costs) and what proportion of hours is used for operational readiness (fixed costs of the cost centers).

The availability of a surgical suite incurs fixed costs of service readiness  such as rent, imputed depreciation and maintenance of the installed equipment and facilities as well as basic cleaning. These costs cannot be allocated to an individual operation on the basis of causation. They are incurred in order to carry out operations at all.
The surgical team must ensure that all the equipment required for a particular operation is in working order and that the cutlery and aids are ready for use. These persons must be present during the operation so that they can provide immediate support in the event of complications. The same applies, mutatis mutandis, to the anesthesia team and to cleaning and disinfection after each operation.
The costs incurred for these functions are proportional costs of the operation, they are caused by the case.

If management accounting of a hospital is to be set up, the requirements of a manufacturing company can be assumed in many areas. However, some special features must be taken into account for the system:

    • The master data must not only be collected on a customer-specific basis, but also on a case-specific basis.
    • External services are usually ordered on a case-specific basis, not item-specific
    • Inventory levels must be continuously updated for both aids and medicines (pharmacy).
    • The time spent by staff in surgery and medicine should also be recorded per case as far as possible. In nursing, this is only possible to a limited extent, as the workload can rarely be measured per patient.
    • The amount of work required for a decision-relevant management accounting system in a hospital is greater than in other economic sectors.

This effort is worthwhile for the following reasons:

    • Better decision-making basis for the management staff, especially for the control of service readiness costs and directly case-dependent costs,
    • Meaningful, performance-related calculations for negotiations with health insurers and state funding bodies,
    • Possibility of cost control in the cost centers, taking into account the current level of activity.

 

 

Management Accounting for Banks and Insurance Companies

Banks

Many banks use the money deposited by their customers to finance loans. They charge interest on the loans granted and use them to pay interest on the depositors’ balances as well as to cover their own costs and profits. In addition to this business with interest differentials, banks have developed countless additional products designed to increase a bank’s profitability. Some examples:

    • Financial consulting for bank customers
    • Securities trading (shares, bonds and other investment products)
    • Financing export and import transactions.
    • Foreign exchange, coin and precious metal trading.

Bank managers focus on both, the profitability of the individual customer and on the profitability of the products offered. The purchase prices for shares, bonds and other traded products can usually directly be charged to the respective customer order. This also applies to the fees to be paid to suppliers on an item-related basis (direct costs of the order).

But the costs of actual banking operations can only rarely be charged to individual products or clients according to their origin. If for example the “Research” cost center recommends buying or holding certain shares, the costs of this recommendation can neither be charged directly to the individual client advisor nor to the client buying on the basis of this recommendation but only to all advisors and all customers.

The bank fees invoiced for the purchase or sale of individual securities can be charged to the client, his advisor or the security, but it is not possible to trace which portion of the fee is attributable to the advisor and which one to the executing traders.

This chain of arguments is intended to show that although the revenues generated from banking transactions can be determined per customer, the costs for the generation of these revenues arise in several cost centers. There it is seldom possible to record the time spent on individual products or customers in a way that reflects the source of the work, because in many cases there is no direct cause-and-effect relationship between the work performed and the product or customer.

Insurance Companies

By paying a premium (one-off or recurring), policyholders want to ensure that they do not have to pay themselves for financial claims arising from losses  and to prevent to go bankrupt or lose significant parts of their assets as a result. In the knowledge that not all policyholders suffer losses, the insurance company tries to persuade as many customers as possible to sign an insurance policy and thus spread the risk across all customers.

The insurance company is financially successful if the premiums from all customers cover over time the costs of all insured losses to be paid as well as the company’s entire operating costs and its profit. This means that insurance management has a lot to do with statistics and estimating the financial development of risks. This is because the proportional product costs arise on the one hand from the losses that occurred and have to be paid for, and on the other hand from building up provisions for losses that are likely to occur (example: damage to buildings that may result in coastal areas from the melting of ice at the North and South Poles or damage caused by earthquakes or forest fires). Statistical analyses can be used to forecast the development of already known types of damage, while the insurance company’s specialists must estimate types of damage that have not yet occurred but are expected.

Incurred and expected claims are the main proportional product costs of an insurance company and must therefore be taken into account in the product calculation.
The sales organization of an insurance company is responsible for the net proceeds and contribution margins of existing and newly concluded insurance contracts. It must therefore know for each contract which product was or is to be sold to which customer groups via which sales channel, via which sales organization, in which region and by which salesperson.

This requires multidimensional planning and determination of the contribution margins per

    • Claim type (product)
    • Product group
    • Customer (policyholder), possibly industry
    • Salesperson
    • Insurance broker
    • Sales region.

Like in a production or service company insurance companies must also determine the contribution margins achieved in the various product and market dimensions after deducting the proportional fixed costs and the fixed costs that can be clearly allocated to a specific dimension.

The key difference is that the proportional production costs of insurance companies also include the assumed costs of risks that have not yet materialized.

The extent to which an insurance company covers potential financial risks through reinsurance is not examined further here.

Management Accounting for Service and Transportation Companies

Service providers in general

The focus is on the individual work performed by the company’s own employees for a customer order. The main task is to charge the performance-related cost center costs to the customer orders according to cause. To do this, it is often necessary for employees to record their working hours per order on a daily basis. Based on this activity recording, these times are multiplied by the planned proportional cost rate per hour of the cost center providing the service and charged directly to the customer order. This procedure is the prerequisite for determining the contribution margin I of a customer order, as well as the absolute contribution margins achieved by a service group.

Material taken from the warehouse is charged to the customer order at standard purchase price. If material for a customer order comes directly from an outside supplier, the bill is recorded at actual price in the accounts payable department and charge directly to the customer order.

This applies above all to workshops and craft businesses of all kinds (e.g. car repair shops, heating fitters, plumbers, tailors). The costs of inventory management and procurement cannot be allocated to the individual sales order according to cause.

If other providers procure services for the execution of the customer order, these are order-specific external services (e.g. software licenses, design drafts, expert opinions, transportation services, laboratory tests). Also such positions are recorded in accounts payable and assigned directly to the customer order.

As in industrial operations, also service providers need to cover their fixed costs and to generate profit. The main focus here is on the customer order, rarely on an individual item. The sum of all contribution margins has to cover all fixed costs plus the EBIT needed.

If new products are developed in service companies that are subsequently made available to customers for use over several years, it should be considered from an operational perspective whether the project costs incurred should be capitalized, i.e. added to fixed assets and depreciated in subsequent years. These considerations are mainly necessary when developing application programs (software for sale) and consulting modules if the development costs are to be covered by the contribution margins of the subsequent years of use. In financial accounting, an attempt may be made to write off the total expenditure for such a project in the year in which it is created in order to save taxes in the short term.

Transportation companies

In airlines, railroad companies, local public transport and direct transportation from the supplier to the recipient, the following cost types are the most important:

    • Personnel costs
    • Fuel and energy consumption
    • Maintenance of the means of transportation
    • Distance or time-dependent imputed depreciation.

Only in the case of direct transportation for a single client from the point of departure to the point of arrival is it possible to determine the proportional costs and thus the contribution margin I of a transport order according to the origin. The time spent by drivers and attendants as well as the miles driven can be measured and evaluated, which makes it possible to determine the proportional costs and the contribution margin I of the transport.

In air, sea, rail or bus transport the transportation options are usually offered according to a timetable or flight plan. The proportional costs arise when the transportation offer is executed. Whether the seats on the train, flight or public transport are well or moderately utilized has little influence on the proportional costs as the personnel deployment remains largely the same and energy consumption changes only insignificantly.

However, if the proportional costs of the unit produced (a flight or a train) remain more or less the same, the net revenue can be increased without significant additional costs by increasing the utilization of the available seats or transport areas. On trains that run between 0900 and 1130 and between 1400 and 1630, a large proportion of seats are often unoccupied. In particular American airlines and railroad companies in Europe recognized this and therefore advertise time-restricted offers at lower than usual prices (see the real examples in “Customer profitability, seller productivity, p. 76”. This approach is known as Revenue Management. On one hand the lower sales prices can increase the absolute contribution margin volume and on the other hand they reduce capacity bottlenecks on flights or trains with a high “Load Factor”.

Like in production also service companies should thus know the proportional costs of their services. This is the only way to determine which services contribute how much to covering fixed costs and profit.

Management Accounting for Industry, Construction and Trade

Industrial production

The main trigger for the development of management accounting was industrial production. Their managers want to know the net revenue of a product or order and compare it with the costs directly caused by the product. The difference is the contribution margin I (CM I).

To achieve this, management accounting is to be set up that it can calculate the proportional production costs in planned and actual values, based on the quantity and activity structure of the manufactured product. The bills of materials and routings with consumption quantities and working times are used for this purpose (see the post “Pizza Dough and Management Accounting“).

Net revenue less proportional production costs results in the CM I per product unit, as described several times in this blog. Based on this, the contributions to the coverage of fixed costs and profit for product groups, customers, customer groups, regions or sales channels can be determined in planned and actual in various levels and dimensions (see the post “Multidimensional CM-Calculation“). After deducting all fixed costs, the top level of summarization is the EBIT achieved by the company as a whole.

Construction Companies

In construction companies the focus is on the contribution margin of a specific customer order. The person responsible for implementing the order (construction manager) is assessed according to how well he succeeded in realizing the planned contribution margin for the order. As in industrial operations it is important to adhere to the planned costs of the bills of materials and subcontracting, as well as to avoid higher actual time consumption by employees compared to the projected target times.

In both industrial and construction operations, the splitting of cost center costs into their proportional and fixed costs is necessary for cost planning and control (see the post “Cost splitting”). Even the best financial accounting software cannot fulfill this requirement because it can only record values, but not quantities and times per order.

Pure Trading Companies

A pure trading company sells its products as they are purchased. Customers usually receive the products directly from the warehouse or from the rack in the store. Packaging for shipping is determined by the size of the order, rarely by the individual item. This usually also applies to online retailers.

Because in trading companies the purchased product is not changed,  no routings are required and bills of materials are only needed if the items to be sold consist of product bundles. Therefore, in the cost centers of a pure trading company, all cost center costs, from purchasing to warehousing, sales and administration, are fixed costs. There is no need to split costs into proportional and fixed costs in the cost centers because the proportional production costs correspond to the stock withdrawals for the sales executed.

Management Accounting for Different Types of Companies

Management Accounting for Different Types of Companies

Private companies, many foundations and associations as well as public organizations and their administrative units manufacture products and services. All these organizations must be able to cover at least the costs of a period under review with the revenue of this period (year) and, where appropriate, to achieve a profit in line with the market. (See the post “Profit in Line with the Market“).

Consumption-related disbursements usually happen before customers pay. Therefore, it must be ensured that sufficient cash and cash equivalents or open credit lines are available at all times to pay the amounts due. For this, financial accounting is the appropriate instrument in all organizations. However, financial accounting is not suitable for planning and controlling an organization as it cannot process neither quantities nor services and relate their costs to the revenues according to cause.

Management accounting is the only way to charge costs and services to individual service and product units in line with causation. It calculates the planned and actual costs directly caused by the manufacturing of a product or service unit and deducts them from the net revenue generated. The result is the contribution margin I. This is used to cover all costs of the organization that are not directly product-related (fixed costs) and to achieve a profit in line with the market.

For decision-relevant management accounting this results in the requirement to split costs into proportional and fixed when planning cost centers and to charge only the proportional costs of the manufactured units to products or other cost centers. This is because there is only a direct cause/effect relationship for the proportional cost center costs. The fixed costs remaining in the cost centers are period costs. They are the responsibility of the cost center managers. They are transferred as cost blocks to the stepwise contribution accounting.

According to current knowledge, only Resource Consumption Accounting (RCA, see L. White, Resource Consumption Accounting) fulfills this requirement. In German-speaking countries, Grenzplankostenrechnung GPK combined with contribution accounting correspond to RCA. RCA shows which costs are caused directly by the manufacture of the individual product unit produced. These costs are to be recorded per unit as inventory receipts and can be charged to the units sold according to their origin. The costs not incurred directly per unit remain in the cost centers. They are to be understood as fixed costs for the period under review. They are fixed costs because they are incurred for the cost center’s readiness to perform.

How to plan cost center costs and to calculate proportional cost rates for product costing is a main topic of this blog. The application of the methodology in different kinds of companies as well as in corporations with many daughter companies or in public administration are discussed in more detail in the following posts. The focus is on:

    • Production and sale of physical products, e.g. industrial and construction companies
    • Pure trading companies
    • Service companies, e.g. consulting companies, auditors, law firms, software developers
    • Transportation companies
    • Banks and insurance companies
    • Healthcare facilities such as hospitals, retirement homes, laboratories
    • Public administrations and educational institutions.

What these types of companies have in common is that they

    • work for several customers,
    • can process several orders for a particular customer, each with several order items,
    • offer different products or services,
    • can divide their organization into cost centers, each of which is the responsibility of one manager,
    •  should charge activities between cost centers according to their origin (Charging Internal Services, no allocation of fixed costs),
    • want to know which customers, products and services generate how much contribution margin.

For the planning and analysis of results by the managers concerned, the contribution margin I per product and per customer is always relevant for decision-making in the various types of companies. Because the fixed costs cannot be allocated to an individual order item according to their origin, the evaluations must always be based on CM I per order item.

The following data model shows that for aggregated reports always 1:n relationships (1 < —>> n) are needed:

Management accounting for different kinds of companie
Management accounting for different kinds of companies

Reading method: On a specific date, a customer can purchase one or more products or services. The proportional product costs are defined per unit, customer and date, the CM I is the difference between the net revenue agreed with the customer and the proportional cost. Based on the customer, the product and the date, net revenue, proportional product costs and CM I can be summarized according to all higher-level dimensions.

Calculating imputed depreciation

Calculating imputed depreciation

Entrepreneurs want to know what existing and additional investments will be required to generate the planned profit (EBIT) in the coming years. The amounts originally paid for the fixed assets are only partially relevant for this because inflation and technological developments often lead to higher replacement values and therefore higher imputed depreciation. If the replacement value of an asset increases by 20% compared to the previous year, the imputed depreciation for this asset must also be increased by 20%. This reduces the (distributable) profit, but also ensures that the money remains in the company to finance replacement investments.

The annual business plan must therefore determine which and how much fixed assets will be required in the planning year in order to achieve the planned profit. For this purpose, it is necessary to estimate by how much the replacement value of an existing and still used asset will increase in the year to plan. The replacement value is divided by the useful life planned by management and results in the imputed depreciation of the asset in the year to plan.

By stipulating that the imputed depreciation is charged to the income statement each year, the owners ensure that the money for replacement or renewal investments remains in the company’s current assets or is used to reduce interest-bearing loans. The funds for maintaining the company’s ability to perform are thus available because less has been distributed to the owners or been given away through lower sales prices. External cash inflow for the further expansion of the company is only necessary to finance growth.

Replacement value and imputed depreciation

Using the example of cost center 100 (sales management) at Ringbook Ltd., the following steps are required to determine the replacement value and the imputed depreciation:

    •  The fixed assets of cost center 100 amounted to EUR 96,000 at the end of 2020.
    • The management of Ringbook Ltd has determined that machines, equipment and software can be used for 8 years until they need to be replaced. This results in a depreciation of 12.5% of the acquisition or replacement value (EUR 12,000, column j) for 2021.
    • The replacement value therefore amounts to EUR 84,000 at the end of 2021.
    • In 2022, an online store was set up for cost center 100. Project costs of 86,602 (column f) were incurred for this. These were capitalized so that the replacement value of the fixed assets in cost center 100 amounted to EUR 182,602 at the end of 2022.
    • In addition, a general inflation rate of 3% (inflation rate, column g) had to be taken into account in 2022. This had an impact on the replacement value of the original investment of EUR 96,000 at the beginning of 2022 (EUR 2,880, column h).
    • In total, 12.5% of the replacement value of 185,482 (column i), i.e. 23,185 (column j), was to be charged as imputed depreciation for 2022.
    • In the years 2023 – 2025, the new investments (column e) are added to the existing assets of the cost center. They must also be taken into account in subsequent years.
    • The effects of the annual inflation rates (column g) increase the replacement value of the existing investments in cost center 100. Depreciation of cost center 100 also increases (column j) and thus also the balance sheet value to be reported in the internal reporting at the end of the year (column k).
Calculating imputed depreciation
Calculating imputed depreciation

Estimating the replacement values of existing investments is often difficult, as quotations have to be obtained from potential suppliers. For this reason, many companies use the index method to calculate the replacement value of an asset. The question is how much an acquisition will increase in the planning year if it is multiplied by the current inflation rate (columns g and h).

Imputed depreciation is a cost type of cost center costs because the operating resources (assets) are assigned to cost centers and are used in these cost centers to produce services. For large assets that are used by several cost centers often a separate cost center is set up. An example is a factory building in which various cost centers are housed.

Imputed Depreciation

Imputed Depreciation

“Imputed depreciation is a cost equivalent for the devaluation of long-term usable operating resources (see Wolfgang Kilger, Flexible Plan Cost Accounting and Contribution Margin Accounting, 9th Improved Edition, Wiesbaden, 1988, p. 398).”
Imputed depreciation amounts are intended to lead to corresponding amounts of money being “reserved” in the financial assets for replacement investments, in order to procure replacement assets if necessary and thus be able to continue to meet the operational purpose. The devaluation equivalents mentioned by W. Kilger are to be calculated on the basis of the replacement values of the investments from the point of view of value retention.

It follows that imputed depreciation should not be calculated on the basis of the historical acquisition value of long-term working assets, but on the amount to be paid at the end of the year for equally efficient assets. From our point of view, a company’s profit potential is only preserved when the equally efficient operating resources can be procured again. As a consequence, there is no distributable profit for the owners/shareholders until the imputed depreciation calculated  from the replacement value has been deducted. Only the residual amount can be distributed with a clear conscience if the company is not to suffer a loss of substance.

In order to determine replacement values and imputed depreciation, it must be clarified annually what changes in the purchase prices are to be expected for the various fixed assets. There are many reasons for imminent purchase price increases or expenses for updates:

    • Inflation in procurement markets
    • New technical or legal regulations to be complied with
    • Changed safety regulations for the operation of the facilities (and buildings)
    • Adaptation of computer programs, program extensions and release changes
    • Switching to another machine supplier because the previous one no longer exists.

It also happens that equipment to be replaced becomes cheaper to purchase because physical plant components are replaced by electronics or metal by plastic.
In the event of expected increases as well as reductions in the purchase prices of fixed and intangible assets, imputed depreciation for the plan year must be recalculated and taken into account in management accounting. Like all other costs they determine the annual internal profit.

Imputed depreciation should not only be calculated for long-term assets such as buildings, facilities, machinery and vehicles. Increasingly, the resources also include rights and potential benefits of a non-physical nature such as ERP- and CRM-systems, rights of use and sales, purchased customer addresses, time-limited licenses of use. If such potential benefits lose their value over time and require new investments to preserve their benefits, the corresponding estimated amounts have to be taken into account in the replacement value, which in turn leads to higher imputed depreciation.
Sustainably successful corporate management requires the inclusion of imputed depreciation and amortization in the income statement. This prevents funds from being distributed to the owners, which will be necessary to maintain the company’s potentials for success and thus its continued existence.